Add your review
I DID NOT KNOW HOW TO DESCRIBE THE LODGE WE STAYED IN UNTILL I READ THE REVIEW FROM MRS FARMER. WE WERE IN NUMBER 102 WHICH WAS ALSO A HOVEL, DIRTY, NEGLECTED, ALL UTENSILS RUSTY AND UNUSABLE, BROKEN BEDROOM FURNITURE,SMELLY DANK ROOMS. WE WRE OFFERED ANOTHER ONE WHICH WAS SLIGHTLY BETTER BUT OUR HOLIDAY WAS NOT ENJOYABLE. WHAT ARE HOESEASONS DOING TO ALLOW THIS TO HAPPEN.. NOT A GOOD RECOMMENDATION FOR THE COMPANY.

Date visited: 16/08/03-23/08/08

Review by geoffrey betts on 2nd January, 2007

Add your review
The park itself is ideally situted. You can walk to 3 pubs - all good food, plus the beach is 2 mins walk. Lovely area. Plyed golf at Princes - £50.00 and worth every penny. The guy who designed the lodges must have had shares in Artex. Both walls and celings covered. Makes walking about a bit of an art form if you dont want scraped elbows. The pool is great and the bar comfortable. But they are not big. The lounge is very small and if you want to eat on a table you have to move things round before you put the table up. We ate out all the time so not a problem. In the summer you open the French doors and eat on the front balcony so it would add a whole new dimension. I thought the location to be worth the nonsensical lodge design.

Date visited: new year 2006

Review by sharon farmer on 30th September, 2006

Add your review
Number 68 is a complete hovel!The beds are disgusting;the quilts are disgusting.I wouldn't let a dog sleep there.Luckily we were moved ou within 30 minutes of us arriving there.They said they would swap us with someone who had not yet checked in!!!Poor people.

Date visited: 16/09/2006